![]() Qualifying times may have been close, but even a few tenths is a huge difference if projected out over 24 hours (which is impossible in and of itself when you consider all of the traffic and other variables in one lap around the Ring).Īnd we have no idea how each team changed their cars otherwise between practice and qualifying.the qualifying setup is never going to be the same setup that a team would race on for 24 hours straight. Its a very cool feeling, but definitely takes away from the driving experience.but whern you want to win, you need to do whatever gets the fastest laptimes and allows you to win.Ģ4 Hours of continuous racing between different drivers, different cars, different teams, and different circumstances (how and when you catch traffic, among 1000's of other variables).there's no way that you can even begin to extract out whether the transmission was at "fault". When you can just flip down 3 gears and not worry about rev matching, or having the tires break loose, you can go deeper and harder, and ultimately smoother allowing for more time on the gas and less time decelerating and slowing down. When I drive the Ferrari Challenge cars (little different sequential system, but overall same idea/function), the biggest place I found time was during braking zones. You are covering ground and still moving.you are just not accelerating for as long. ![]() once your engine stop pushing the car it will immediately start to decelerate.but the car is not stopping on track and then time travelling to when you finish your shift. Once you let off the throttle you are accelerating at a slower rate, or in the case of lifting completely off to shift, you are immediately decreasing your speed. You'll need to determine what rate you are accelerating at for the given speed, aero loads, gear, etc.then you have to determine how much time you lost by not accelerating for that time period. The car is just not accelerating for those 0.2s. Whether that is worth that much money to you, only your wallet knows.īryan hit it.0.2s saved in a shift is NOT 0.2s saved in a lap, in fact its much much less. 2 seconds per shift, for 10 shifts a lap, that lap will be about 2 seconds faster. ![]() That has been how it has worked for decades. Without those bells and whistles, you would lift off the throttle briefly and get really good at the of timing when you actually change gears. You'd be better served getting some one-to-one coaching from a pro driver and a data acquisition guru to show you where you can pick up speed.If you want a flat shift, then yes you need an ECU that can accommodate the strain gauges or whatever switch you run to cut power during the shift. You're only gaining 0.2s of throttle time, which is something, but not enough to merit spending that much money for a club-level car. Just because you're shifting 0.2s faster per shift doesn't mean that you actually are gaining that much time per shift. ![]() Don't you need an ECU that cuts engine torque on upshift? If you don't, you'll have to use the clutch, and that doesn't do you any good when you're talking about shifting faster.Īnd you probably will only see a couple tenths per lap improvement in times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |